Featured Events

Newsletters & Updates

Enter your email address and name, then select the newsletters you wish to subscribe too.

Email
Name

  • Lake HS Announcements
  • Lake High School
  • Lake Middle School
  • Lake Elementary
  • Superintendent
  • Athletics
  • Music Dept
  • Transportation

RUMOR CENTRAL

Rumors and speculation are once again circulating through the Lake Local Schools community. Much of this is in response to the recent announcement of teacher lay-offs and staff cuts or the construction of the new Lake High School.

In this age of social media and mobile communication, it is easy to reach hundreds of people with one click and share information that may or may not be accurate. The Board of Education and Administration will use this page to attempt to expose any accusations and make sure the public is aware of the source when possible and THE TRUTH.

We also want to remind and direct you to an area of the website that has been posting information regarding finances and information from the Ohio Department of Education at /education-updates

If you hear a rumor or have questions regarding anything you've heard, please contact the Board of Education or Superintendent's office at (419) 661-6677 or JWitt@lakeschools.org 


 

Rumors...

Rumor:

Channel 13 has reported that Lake Schools is building an addition onto the new Lake High School this summer.

Lake Schools Responds:

* Updated May 14, 2013

After a series of meetings, simulations, and discussions amongst our administrative team, in consultation with the board of education, and in partnership with The Collaborative, Inc., it is our goal to add six classrooms to the new high school in an area that was designated for classrooms in the original drawings.

We will NOT be adding on to the high school!!! There is a shell of an area already with a rooftop unit in place, rough-ins for electrical and other structural mandates ready to go. We will need to frame and drywall to shape the classrooms, add electrical and technology components, and furnish the area with casework.

Our goal is to move our 8th grade to the high school, move our 5th grade to the middle school schedule, and re-arrange a crowded elementary school. Pending the numbers that come back to us through the bid process, we would make these changes for the beginning of the 2013-14 school year. We realize that the time frame is tight but we believe it is in the best interests of our students to complete this move, if possible. We anticipate making a final decision by May 25, 2013 and we appreciate your patience.

This project will be funded through a gift from the estate of Joseph Baker, the proceeds from the sale of the Walbridge building, the cost savings realized from the closing of Walbridge, and possibly Permanent Improvement dollars.

April 24, 2013
After a series of meetings, simulations, and discussions amongst our administrative team, in consultation with the board of education, and in partnership with The Collaborative, Inc., it is our goal to add five classrooms to the new high school in an area that was designated for classrooms in the original drawings.
We will NOT be adding on to the high school!!! There is a shell of an area already with a rooftop unit in place, rough-ins for electrical and other structural mandates ready to go. We will need to frame and drywall to shape the classrooms, add electrical and technology components, and furnish with casework.
The Collaborative is going to provide architectural services and construction documents, and they will also handle the bidding process.
Our goal is to move our 8th grade to the high school, move our 5th grade to the middle school schedule, and re-arrange a crowded elementary school. Pending the numbers that come back to us through the bid process, we would make these changes for the beginning of the 2013-14 school year.
This project will be funded through a gift from the estate of Joseph Baker, the proceeds from the sale of the Walbridge building, the cost savings realized from the closing of Walbridge, and possibly Permanent Improvement dollars.


Rumor:  

"I believe the school district has enough money as it is right now. I don't believe in supporting school levies," said Lake parent Chris Anello.

Lake Schools Responds:

Mr. Anello has not spoken nor has he communicated with any member of the board of education or the administration about our financial status.  Unfortunately, the Lake Local School District does NEED to pass an operating levy.  Our five year forecast has been on our website for years and the Ohio Department of Education performed an audit that firmly supports our documentation and forecasting.  We are more than willing to sit down with any citizen and explaining our situation and we wish that Mr. Anello would take advantage of that opportunity.
 


Rumor:

Is any other citizen of Lake schools sick of hearing and reading about how the new school was not funded by taxpayers' money. Well I am. We all know how it was funded. Give yourselves a pat on the back. I would like to give credit to the Lake teachers for taking a pay freeze and paying more of their insurance. Congratulations you have now joined the rest of the working world. I too had a pay freeze recently and I still pay more than you do for my family coverage insurance, but hey what you did is a start.

I question why for only a year? Is this something that once the levy is passed will change or does it depend on the economy? From my experience with some of the Lake teachers and staff they are not all dedicated to their students like was commented on in a former article. The signs that state it's time to help ourselves---what do you think the citizens are doing? They are helping themselves to stay out of the poor house by paying increased taxes.--Tena Pettit, Walbridge

Lake Schools Responds:

We share Mrs. Pettit’s sentiment about the continued message of “no tax payer money used in the new high school.”  Unfortunately, we feel compelled to repeat ourselves because some people refuse to believe that to be true and those people still make the comment in the community that the levy is being used to pay for the new building.  Nobody is looking for a pat on the back.  The repetitious message attempts to have the facts outshine the opinions of some taxpayers.

The contract between the board of education and the teacher’s union is for one year because we only have enough money to certify a contract for one year with the state auditor’s office.  We are simply following the protocol set forth by the policies and procedures that govern the State of Ohio.

 


Rumor:

Lake is going to start charging admission to Senior Citizens in the district for athletic events.

Lake Schools Responds:

False.  We have never discussed this topic.  Our policy will continue as it has for years.


 

Rumor

​Why did the Board of Education place a resolution for the same levy on the November ballot? Are they asking for money again?

Lake Schools Responds:

Although Lake's levy passed, the Board of Education approved a resolution placing the same levy on the November ballot. The reason that they did this is because the November election filing deadline happens before the results are officially certified by the Wood County Board of Elections which won't occur until sometime during the last week of August.  As of the day after the election, not all absentee and provisional votes had been counted so the results of any election are subject to change until it is officially certified.

When certification does occur, the Board of Education intends to pass another resolution withdrawing the November Levy petition.  In essence, the Board created an insurance policy in the event the election results change through the election certification process.

 


 

Rumor:

The new building is going to cost a fortune to heat and that is the reason the school is asking for the levy.

Lake Local Schools Responds:

Truth - In reality, we have been told by construction experts that the new building, which is equipped with the latest technology and efficiency measures, will either keep our heating and cooling bills the same or they will be lower than they were in the previous building. Efficiency of use and cost savings measures have been at the heart of our decision making from the very beginning of the project.
 


 

How do state lottery profits impact our schools?

Date:    July 18, 2012
 

Re:       Clarification on Lottery Profits and Impact on Schools

Recently, the Ohio Lottery Commission released a statement to the media announcing record sales and profits from the Ohio Lottery. Reports in the news about the additional funds transferred into the Lottery Profits Education Fund (LPEF) gave the impression that the increase gave school districts additional funding. Of course you know that even though all lottery profits are used to cover funding for education, there is no automatic increase in funding for school districts when profits increase — the state simply uses it to replace other funds.

Our three organizations are concerned about the implications these news reports might have for your districts. They may cause misunderstanding about your district’s funding, creating a public perception that does not match reality.

Because of this concern, we have issued a press release in an attempt to set the record straight. Click here for a copy: OSBA/BASA/OASBO Press Release

Feel free to use the statement or the information included in it for your own use.

The following is a link to one of the many news articles based on the Ohio Lottery Commission’s announcement: AP Article. Click here.

In addition, the Akron Beacon Journal published a good editorial in response to these unfair reports. Click here to see the editorial: ABJ Editorial.


If you have questions, feel free to contact us. We hope that together we can dispel public misperception on this issue.
 


 

Rumor:

Walbridge Elementary has already been sold for $43,000

Lake Local Schools Responds:

TRUTH—The building has not been sold.  It will be put up for sale at a later date.  With our task of moving into the new high school, moving classrooms from Lake Elementary to Lake Middle School, and moving Walbridge Elementary to Lake Elementary, the sale of the Walbridge site will not take place until next fall at the earliest.  There is a legal process to follow just as there was when we sold the Millbury building several years ago.
 


 

Question from Barbara Kohn

I just found out from Lake Twp Administration that the new school will
not be opened to residents of Lake Township in the event of (hopefully not) a
tornado warning.  Is that true?  I understand it is because of insurance
liability.  I do believe the voters pay taxes for that building – and we are
not allowed to possibly save our life?  It would be OUR choice to enter that
building in an event such as that.  Can you explain and tell us where
residents without basements should go?  Schools have always been a shelter –
until NOW. 

Lake Schools Responds:

There have been ZERO discussions with township officials regarding the usage
of the new high school as a storm shelter.  Taking this one step further,
there have been ZERO discussions with any insurance companies about
liability as it relates to using the building as a storm shelter.  Our
school district has always reached out to the community in times of need.  A
new high school building will not change that attitude.

Jim Witt, Superintendent
Lake Local Schools

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Mrs. Kohn,

I am not sure which Lake Twp. Administrator you spoke to, but I am not aware of any conversation taking place where the school said the new High School would not be available as a tornado shelter.  As a matter of fact our AD/Maintenance director recently met with the Red Cross to designate our Middle School as a shelter area until the new High School opens.  I think this is a fabrication.

As for the voters paying taxes for the new building, the answer to that is no on two fronts.  First, NO local tax money is being used in the construction of the new building.  It is being paid for ENTIRELY by insurance money, a grant from the Ohio School Facilities Commission and a grant from Kohl’s. 

Secondly, with the failure of our recent levies, I think it would be fair to say that the taxpayers have no interest in supporting that building anyway.  It would appear that if the community needs to support to the building for you to use it as a shelter, you could be out of luck.  As school officials we are inclined to say yes but I am not sure you will receive the same support from the community if it is needed.


If you have further questions, or rumors you have heard that you would like to get the facts on, please feel free to contact me in the future.

Lee Herman
Lake High/Middle School Principal

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

We strongly encouraged the Red Cross to use the high school, because it is much better suited for disaster relief with it’s amenities.

Dave Shaffer
Director, Maintenance and Grounds/Athletic Director


 

To the Editor: Cut all extra-curricular activities at Lake
Written by Ken Smith
Wednesday, 18 April 2012 08:23

I volunteer at Lake Schools and have offered my assistance whenever it was
requested.  That does not mean that I have to agree with the decisions made
by the school board and the administration.
The school board likes to use circular justification.  They decide to add a
PE position and that justifies hiring a teacher. They increase class size
and change kindergarten, so that means that the Walbridge building is not
needed.  Lake has been Excellent the last two years, so cut education
opportunities to our youngest and most needy.
I was asked to offer my solution to the problem.  I think Lake has great
programs and great staffs, any cuts that are made are going to hurt someone
or something.  Eric Hirzel stated "Make no mistake.  These cuts will affect
education in a very negative way."
I would cut all extra-curricular activities, close the buildings at 4,
cancel all unnecessary busing, and look to positions that have not always
existed. Extra-curricular spending makes up 2.3% of the budget.  That is
$322,000 and taxes add about $25,000 to this cost.
Lake went many years without a Curriculum/special ed director, this would
save about $100,000.  Part of the phase one cuts the board made were to not
replace 4 teachers and to share a principal between the high school and the
middle school. I would continue those cuts.
These cuts would have a major effect on the budget, but there are other cuts
that are currently listed that would have to be made to make up the
difference.  All of these cuts are reversible when the budget allows without
major capital expenditures.
My biggest concern is selling the Walbridge building.  If it is necessary to
sell it, you are restricting future board of education members from
returning our class size to what has made us Excellent, and returning to
all-day every-day kindergarten.  What would be the cost to replace these
class rooms, and how would that be paid for?
Ken Smith
Northwood

Lake Local Schools Responds:

During his single Lake Board of Education term, Ken Smith took part in
discussions regarding the deteriorating condition of Walbridge Elementary. He
knows how cost prohibitive the upgrades were that loomed to maintain it and
that permanent closure was inevitable. Yet he continues to criticize the board
for making that sound decision to close down and sell it. If he is suggesting
it would be prudent use of tax dollars to maintain an old, empty, and
expensive building, the taxpayers of our district can take comfort that they
made the right choice in 2009 when he was overwhelmingly defeated in his
re-election bid.

Smith is also fully aware what the loss of enrollment cost in dollars when
extra curriculars were cut back in Œ05.  The following year those programs
were studied and those deemed non-cost effective were eliminated and the rest
were restored.  Many studies show athletics, music, arts, clubs, etc. are
vital to the educational experience.  Motivation for academic achievement,
teaching life lessons about commitment and teamwork are among the many things
kids get from those activities.  Admissions directors of universities all tell
us that being active in functions outside the classroom play a critical role
in their consideration of applicants.  Considering the cost, 2-3% of the total
budget, those programs are money well spent.

Smith claimed that the district went ³many years² without a curriculum
director. Way to pay attention Ken.  During your entire term on the BOE, the
district has had curriculum director and special education coordinator (a
position required by law).   Both were provided through purchased services
from Wood County ESC until 2007 when both of those jobs were combined into a
single, highly effective, in-house position at significant cost savings to the
district.  There is little doubt that move played a key role in achieving our
recent high academic ratings.  Smith was on the board at the time and voted
³yes² on that resolution. 

Why would he publicly criticize things he previously approved?  "Rogue Ken"
has always had penchant to be disruptive and it¹s easy to throw darts from
behind a computer keyboard. 

I'm pretty sure we haven't seen the last from Mr. Smith and if history repeats
itself, the attacks will become personal.  To the readers who want the truth,
please contact a board member or visit:

http://www.lakeschools.org/rumor-central
 

Eric Hirzel
Vice President
Lake Local Board of Education


 

Additional comment from Barbara Kohn:

Thank you for your response.  I realize the new building is being put up with insurance money; however, in the future, operating and such is paid for by the taxpayers.  You can’t blame the taxpayers entirely.  They, too, have run out of money.  They have taken more than their fair share of cuts in their own households.   Good luck in the future.

Lake Local Schools Responds:

I understand that some people cant afford the increase.  I also am aware that some people just don’t want to pay the increase even though they could.  I live in Lake Township as well and my property was recently lowered in value, meaning I will pay less tax.  The majority of people will pay less.

The funding system in Ohio was ruled unconstitutional nearly 20 years ago but the lawmakers at the State level refuse to change the system.  Rather than punish our local children and their futures, I would encourage voters to support the schools but vote out lawmakers who refuse to change the rules.


Lee Herman
Lake High/Middle School Principal


 

"WHY DO BUS DRIVERS PARK THEIR BUSES AT THEIR HOME INSTEAD OF AT SCHOOL?
WOULDN'T IT BE MORE COST EFFECTIVE IF THEY STARTED FROM SCHOOL EVERY DAY?"

--anonymous phone call

 

Lake Local Schools Responds:

The buses have been parked at the homes of bus drivers for many years.

Over the span of those years, the reasons have ranged from not enough
parking space at school to security concerns.

In almost every case, the driver's home has been on their assigned bus
route, so there hasn't been an additional fuel cost or savings by parking at
their homes.  During the winter months the buses need to be plugged in and
the cost of the additional electricity has been the burden of the driver.

Beginning with the 2012-13 school year, all buses will be parked on our
campus.  There were several factors that prompted this change, but the two
most significant are that we currently lease a bus maintenance garage within
one mile of campus and we will have ample parking and electricity to
accommodate all our buses, which has not been the case in the past.

Tammy Tapley
Transportation Director, Lake Local Schools




 

Does Lake have three full-time Athletic Directors with salaries in excess of $100,000?

Lake Local Schools Responds:

The answer is no to both parts of the question. Aaron Tobias and Jamie Schoen are both teachers who will have full class loads next year.  Aaron is paid a stipend of $4,886 for the entire year for his duties as assistant athletic director.  Jamie receives a stipend of $4,256 per year for her duties as the middle school athletic director. 

For the past two years, Aaron has assumed the duties of full time athletic director so Dave Shaffer could be freed up to concentrate on the new building.  During the past two years, one half of Dave’s salary has been paid through insurance and approximately $20,000 of Aaron’s salary has been paid that way as well.  Next year, Dave will go back to being the Athletic Director and the Maintenance Director and Aaron will resume his duties as a full time physical education teacher and assistant athletic director.

 


 

As posted on Facebook:  by Barb Rice and Thomas Frisby

Barb Rice
To Lake administrators and board members. Instead of laying off teachers because the levy didn't pass, it's time to cut some sports programs first for a change! Classroom courses and teachers should be a priorty over sports. Learning is why we send our kids to school in the first place isn't it? Not to learn how to be the best football, basketball.... player. Why are our teachers always the first to go when schools have financial problems? Where are you priorities? I want my tax dollars to go to the teachers!!!!
LikeUnlike·  · See Friendship · March 21 at 8:02am ·

Thomas Frisby likes this.

Thomas Frisby
i totally agree with you Barb!! I graduated in 2007 and was in high school when we had levey problems in the school years of 2004-05, 05-06. Extracurriculars, educational programs, teachers/staff are always the first to go but the higher sp...orts dont. I love sports dont get me wrong, I was Adrian College's Sports Editor during my senior year at Adrian last yr and loved it but something needs to be done. I remember right before I graduated from Lake they decided to cut sports, tennis, hockey and bowling. I happened to be a part of the last tennis team that Lake had and I found it outrageous that they cut these sports but not others. It's time to get some priorities in orderSee More
March 22 at 1:10pm ·

LikeUnlike

Barb Rice

Everyone should voice on this website how they want their tax dollars spent, for the football and basketball teams and the coaches, or for our teachers? Which is more important for our children?
March 22 at 6:13pm · LikeUnlike

Lake Local Schools Responds:

To Lake administrators and board members. Instead of laying off teachers because the levy didn't pass, it's time to cut some sports programs first for a change!

-Extracurricular activities (including marching band, the fall play, the spring musical and sports) make up approximately 2.3% of the general budget.  These activities absorbed 5% of the total cuts.  The budget from these activities was cut 18% for next year.

Classroom courses and teachers should be a priority over sports. Learning is why we send our kids to school in the first place isn't it?
-We agree and that always has been the position of this district. We also recognize that students need activities to round out their education. These activities include sports, as you mention, but also marching band, the fall play, the spring musical, and our nationally recognized Students In Action.  As noted above, these activities make up 2.3% of our general budget.

Why are our teachers always the first to go when schools have financial problems?
-The elimination of any position is unfortunate, and obviously a very difficult decision.  Teachers were not the first reduction.  Two years ago an administrator was let go and other cost reductions were made so that we could keep all of our teachers.  Unfortunately, with the failure of two levies, we are now at a point where all positions had to be looked at and further reductions had to be made.

Where are you priorities?
-Our priorities are, and always have been with the education of our students. 

I want my tax dollars to go to the teachers!!!!
-In addition to the teachers, we also have custodians, administrators, support staff, bus drivers, and counselors that tax dollars are needed for.

Scott Swartz
Lake School Board Member

 


 

As posted on Facebook: by Nancy Johnson Potter 

YEA BECAUSE THEY SPENT MORE THAN THEY HAD AND NOW I HEAR THEY ARE GOING BANKRUPT AND THE STATE IS TAKING OVER THE SCHOOL IN SEPT. WAY TO GO....PRIORITIES!!!!!! GRRRRRRR. THEN THEY WANT US TO VOTE ON A LEVY FOR THEIR MISTAKES!!!! PEOPLE ARE TIRED OF IT!!! ITS SAD FOR THE KIDS THO. I HEARD THEY ARE CLOSING DOWN WALB. SCHOOL AS THEY DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO HEAT IT. GIVE ME A BREAK!!!!! BUT WE HAVE A BEAUTIFUL TRACK AND FOOTBALL FIELD AND A SCHOOL THAT IS ABOVE AND BEYOND!! NOW....WHAT ARE THE LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT KIDS GOING TO DO WHEN THE STATE TAKES OVER? THEY WILL ONLY TAKE CARE OF IT FOR A WHILE THEN CLOSE IT DOWN, IS WHAT I HEAR!!! SO SAD!!!! GOOD TEACHERS ARE BEING LET GO FOR OTHERS MISTAKES!!!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!

Lake Local Schools Responds:

1. The Ohio Department of Education is NOT taking over the school district in September.  There is a lengthy and involved process before a district gets “taken” over.  If you go the Ohio Department of Education website, you can navigate to the section on that process and view it, step by step

2. Walbridge Elementary is being closed as a cost saving measure.  It is an old school that has served many generations of students and it has done so well.  However, it is at the point where the maintenance and upkeep is a really high dollar amount and our students will be better served at Lake Elementary.  This discussion to close this building has been taking place amongst the board of education members and administration for YEARS.

3. We do have a beautiful track and football field.  We also have a nice band room and next year our choir room will be outstanding.  Our classrooms are well lit and functional.  All in all, we have facilities that are beneficial to the total educational process and we believe that our children are worth it.  Our new school is not “above and beyond”.  It is a functional building that will produce 21st century learners who will have to be able to compete for jobs in a global economy.  This new building will maximize the insurance monies and donations that were received in the aftermath of the tornado.  In spite of rumors to the contrary, there are NO tax dollars being spent on this building.

4. What are the kids going to do when the State takes over?  Quite honestly, the kids probably won’t even notice if the State takes over.  If you do some research on what happens when the State “takes over”, you will find that it is much less intrusive than most people are lead to believe.  And, the State of Ohio is not going to shut down a school district.  In fact, one of the first items on the agenda of a governing board will be to pass a levy.  And, it will be a levy that will most likely be more significant in terms of millage than the two that were just rejected by the voters. 

5. The financial crisis we face is not due to "mistakes" by the Lake School Board or Administration.  It is because of a well-documented  and ongoing reduction in funding from the Federal Government, State of Ohio, and even local property tax collections.  Just in the last year our funding has been reduced by an additional $1. 6 Million Dollars.  This year alone we have collected $425,000 less in local property taxes.   Because of reevaluation by the Wood County Auditor, most Lake homeowners are now paying less for property taxes in 2012 than before. 

6. Our "priorities" could not be more focused on our primary mission of providing a quality education at a low cost to our taxpayers.  Lake Schools has been rated Excellent With Distinction and Excellent the past two years by the Ohio Department of Education, despite the fact that Lake spends less per student than 80% of the other Ohio schools.
 


Letter to the Editor, as submitted to The Press - by Ken Smith:

To the Editor: Reader questions hiring of new football coach at Lake
Written by Ken Smith
Friday, 02 March 2012 16:51

Lake Local Schools never fail to amaze me. When the levy failed it was announced that layoffs were likely. In February it was stated that: "The cuts we're looking at right now will affect programs and education" while at the same time they decided to hire a football coach at an inflated salary! They have not even decided what position he will be in. So which is more important, football, or programs and education? The last teacher contract that I have a copy of says that when someone who has retired from the State Teachers Retirement System is to be hired they shall be paid at the Bachelor's degree Step 5, which would be less than $40,000 per year, yet they decided to pay some one that will teach in the physical education department $53,764. Most schools only pay at step 5 for any teacher with more than 5 years' experience that is coming into the district, which is one reason teachers do not switch districts very often. I am sure the teachers in the past would have loved to have received that level of pay. What will they pay a teacher who isn't a coach? Who or what will be cut to pay this salary?

Last year during the levy request, they stated that they were not replacing three teachers that had retired in order to save money, but I guess if someone can coach football, then the priorities can change.  Bob Abbey, the previous coach a Lake graduate and a current staff member, was selected after the School Board was not happy with the record of the varsity football team. Now they are not happy again so they hire someone at an inflated salary for a position they do not need. I have nothing against Bob Olwin, but I really have to wonder where the Lake Board of Education and the Lake Schools administration place their priorities. When your budget gets tight, you need to reduce unnecessary spending and concentrate on the things that are most important. I guess we know where their priorities are.

Ken Smith
Northwood

Lake Local Schools Responds:

1.  Lake's "priorities" are well-established.  The Ohio Department of Education has awarded Lake Schools the academic ratings of "Excellent With Distinction" and "Excellent" the last two years.  These are the two highest ratings for academic achievement possible.  These high academic ratings were achieved by Lake while spending less per student than 80% of the other Ohio schools. 

2.  Lake needed a teacher to fill a Physical Education/Health Education position and Lake needed a new head football coach.  Bob Olwin has a proven record of being both an outstanding Health/Phys Ed teacher and one of the best football coaches in Ohio. Moreover, Lake will pay him          less than other area teachers who are head football coaches.

3.  Mr. Smith has not attended a Lake School Board meeting or workshop in over two years now.  He was voted off the School Board by the Lake voters in November, 2009. He did not attempt to discuss his concerns with or get his facts straight from any Administrators or current Board Members before writing his recent letter.

4.  Mr. Smith concluded his letter by stating: " I guess we know where their priorities are."  That is true. Lake's priorities could not be more clear: achieving academic excellence at one of the lowest cots per student in Ohio. That is exceptional educational value for both our students and taxpayers.
 


Letter to the Editor, as submitted to The Press, March 2012 - by Ken Smith

What’s the real cost?
To the editor: Studies have found that the size of classes in the first years of school have a substantial impact on students’ math and reading, and the results continue through their entire school career. The reduction in the elementary staff and the elimination of all-day, every-day kindergarten and to close the Walbridge building is going to have an immediate as well as a long-term effect on the quality of education that our children will receive for many years.

I have volunteered for the Ohio Reads program, both before and after the change to all-day, every-day kindergarten and my experiences have been that the kindergarten students are doing much better and are learning much more and faster than in the past, making them better prepared for the next years of their education. It would be interesting to have the principal prepare a report on the improvements that have been seen since the implementation of all-day every-day kindergarten.

Tim Krugh (board of education president) commented that all-day, every-day kindergarten is not required, but what other programs that are not required did the board decide were more important than the education of our elementary students? There are plenty of programs and activities that are not required of the school that the board has decided to fund. While I support these activities, I do not value them more than the education of our youngest students. While removing eight elementary teachers, a guidance counselor and the only school nurse, they hire a football coach as a physical education teacher for almost $54,000 a year.

How much is it going to cost the district to return to the quality of education that our children must have? With the closing and proposed sale of the Walbridge building, it means that the district is going to have to build either an addition to the existing elementary school, or another building to return our class size to where it should be. Otherwise, it means that we will never be able to get our education standards back to where they should be due to a lack of space. How many millions are they going to ask for? How many mills will that levy be for? Is it wise to make cuts that are going to require additional taxes in the future?

How can the school board and administration expect the public to support them when they put the education of our students second? How can you keep spending money on non-academic and even academic extras while increasing class size to the most vulnerable students? Some of these cuts are appropriate, but most of these cuts should be last place cuts and not second place.

Kenneth Smith
Northwood

Editor’s note: Smith is a former Lake School Board Member.

Lake Local Schools Responds:

Facts Are Stubborn Things
Lake Schools' "priorities" are well-established.  The Ohio Department of Education has awarded Lake the academic ratings of "Execellent With Distinction" and "Excellent" the last two years.  These are the highest academic achievement ratings possible.  And these academic ratings were achieved by Lake while spending less per student than 80% of the other Ohio school districts.

Lake needed a teacher to fill a Health Education/Physical Education position and Lake also needed a head football coach.  Bob Olwin was hired because he has a proven record of being an outstanding Health/Phys Ed teacher and mentor and is also one of the best football coaches in Ohio.  Moreover, Lake will pay Mr. Olwin substantially less than other area teachers who are also head football coaches.

The financial crisis at Lake Schools is because of a well-documented and ongoing reduction of funding from the Federal, State, and Local governments.  Just in the last two years alone Lake's funding has been reduced by an additional $1.6 Million Dollars, including $425,000 less in local property taxes collected this year.

The net cost-cutting measures of $1.125 Million Dollars taken by the Board on March 21, 2012 were indeed severe and harsh, but were necessary to avoid a deficit of almost $1.2 Million Dollars by the end of next January.  Those 43 layoffs and other cuts, including closure of the Walbridge school building and elimination of all day kindergarten, would have been unnecessary if the levy had passed last year.  If an operating levy does not pass this year it will become necessary to make yet another (third) round of even more devastating cuts.

Mr. Ken Smith, a recent public critic of Lake Schools, has not attended a Lake School Board meeting for two years now.  He was voted off the School Board by the Lake Township voters in November, 2009.  Mr. Smith did not attempt to discuss his concerns with or get his facts straight from any of the Administrators or current Board Members before writing his recent derrogatory and misinformed letters to the Editor.  Mr. Smith's frustration, if not anger, over the recent cuts is misdirected toward the School Board members and Administrators.  We all voted in favor of the levy and worked diligently to get the levy passed so that these drastic cuts would not have become the harsh reality that they now are.

Mr. Smith concluded one of his recent letters by stating: "I guess we know where their priorities are."  That much is true.  Lake's priorities could not be more clear:  achieving academic and co-curricular excellence at one of the lowest costs per student in Ohio.  That is exceptional value for both our students and taxpayers.  But don't take my word for it.  Check out the recent analysis of Lake's finances and staffing levels by the Ohio Department of Education posted on the Lake website at http://www.lakeschools.org

Tim Krugh
President
Lake School Board

​* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Recently Ken Smith commented that the Lake school board and administration put the education of our students second.  For the past two years this district has been rated excellent.  To be fair, this rating, in addition to a board of education, requires a collaboration between our great faculty and the parents in our district who emphasize the importance of education to their children.  This is all made possible by our community who have paid their tax dollars providing needed financial support to our school.

Smith notes the loss of all day kindergarten, the elimination of 8 teaching positions, a guidance counselor and the school nurse.  These positions were eliminated as a result of two levy failures.  As Smith should know, simple economics dictate that if you have a deficit you need to increase revenue or reduce expenses.  We were unable to raise revenue, so expenses had to be cut. These cuts were necessary and were made with the best interest of our students in mind.  Mr. Olwin was hired to fill a need for a teacher certified to teach Physical Education.  We had only one to teach three grades.

Smith notes the closing of the Walbridge building.  Would this district be better off maintaining this building for potential future use?  All of our students will be at the main campus, will taxpayers want to spend money maintaining a building that is not needed?  This building is an expense that this district simply can not afford.

Smith notes the expense of the “extras” which I assume he is referring to extracurricular activities.    These activities (including marching band, the fall play, the spring musical and sports) make up approximately 2.3% of the general budget.  These activities absorbed 5% of the total cuts.  The budget from these activities was cut 18% for next year.

Mr. Smith voiced his displeasure with the cuts that were approved, but he did not offer his solution.  I am interested to hear how he proposes to come up with the needed $1.2 million. 

In closing, I would like to thank Ken Smith for his past service on the school board and for his efforts to pass the levy in 2006.  I commend him for his volunteer work with the Ohio Reads program.  With that being said, I take issue with his statements and insinuations that the Board of Education has placed the education of our students second.

​Scott Swartz
Lake School Board Member

 


 

Board Resolution, March 21, 2012

RESOLUTIONS IMPLEMENTING A REDUCTION IN FORCE
AND
OTHER COST-CUTTING MEASURES
March 21, 2012

 

It is recommended by the Superintendent and Treasurer that the Lake Local Schools Board of Education approve the following resolutions to reduce expenditures to avoid an impending deficit of the operating expense fund:

Whereas, the United States government has recently reduced its funding to Lake Local Schools by $647,389; and

Whereas, the State of Ohio government has recently reduced its funding to Lake Local Schools by $396,496; and

Whereas, the State of Ohio government will reduce its funding to Lake Local Schools for the 2012-2013 school year by an additional $129,823;

Whereas, the Local Government funding from real estate tax collections  decreased by $425,903 for the current 2011-2012 fiscal year;

and

Whereas, these recent reductions in revenues and funding during the current biennium budget of Lake Local Schools totals $1,599,611; and

Whereas, the Board of Lake Local Schools took measures to reduce expenditures by approximately $1,300,000 in the Spring of 2010; and

Whereas, Lake Local Schools was rated “Excellent with Distinction” and “Excellent” by the Ohio Department of Education for school years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 at one of the lower costs per student in the State of Ohio;

Whereas, a new 4.75 mill levy for operating expenses was defeated by the Lake Local School District voters in both August and November of 2011; and

Whereas, no operating expense funds have been used, and cannot be used pursuant to Ohio law, for construction of the new high school building or for any of the other structures and facilities built or rebuilt after the June 5, 2010 tornado;

Whereas, none of the tornado damage insurance claims funds or the post-tornado grants from the Ohio School Facilities Commission, the Ohio Department of Education, or Kohl’s can be used for operating expenses;

Whereas, the financial reports of our Treasurer, as confirmed by a recent review by the Ohio Department of Education, projects a deficit of the Lake Local Schools operating expense fund of minus - $411,234 by December 31, 2012; minus - $1,178,593 by January 31, 2013; and minus - $1,272,712 by June 30, 2013; and

Whereas the Superintendent and Treasurer have worked the past three-plus months to study, assess, and evaluate these financial realities with the task of proposing the cost-cutting measures needed to avoid a deficit and resulting financial emergency and crisis; and

Whereas, the Superintendent and Treasurer have met with and consulted with our Administrative employees, the Lake Education Association (LEA), and OAPSE Local 335 (OAPSE) in the development of these proposed cost-cutting measures;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Education of the Lake Local School District that the following positions be reduced, effective May 31, 2012, as part of a REDUCTION IN FORCE pursuant to R.C. 3319.17 and R.C. 3319.172 and the negotiated agreements with the LEA and OAPSE:

1. Thirteen (13) coaching positions.
2. Three (3) co-curricular positions.
3. Ten (10) LEA positions, including eight (8) classroom teachers, one (1) guidance counselor, and one (1) nurse.
4. Eleven and one-half (11.5) OAPSE positions, including two and one-half (2.5) secretaries, three (3) custodians, one (1) maintenance employee, two (2) bus drivers, and three (3) study hall monitors
5. One (1) central office employee.
6. Five (5) Wood County Educational Service Center (WCESC) positions.
7. Extended time supplemental work/positions will also be reduced or eliminated.

The employees listed on Attachment A holding the positions listed immediately above at 3, 4, and 5 shall be laid-off and their employment contracts suspended, effective May 31, 2012, due to implementation of this reduction in force action.  The coaching/co-curricular/supplemental and WCESC positions listed on Attachment A and immediately above at 1, 2, 6, and 7 shall not be filled after May 31, 2012 due to implementation of this reduction in force action.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Education of the Lake Local School District that the Walbridge Elementary School Building will be closed at the end of the 2011-2012 school year and that the Walbridge School Building, and its related real estate, will then be sold pursuant to Ohio law.

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Education of the Lake Local School District that, beginning with the 2012-2013 school year, all-day – every-day kindergarten will be reduced to every other day kindergarten.

Collectively, these reductions in force and other cost-cutting measures will reduce expenditures for the District by $1,154,669.00 from now until June 30, 2013.

Tim Krugh Comments
Regarding the
RIF Resolution
3/21/12

-- Reality can be harsh, even brutal  at times.

-- That is the situation we now face here at Lake Local Schools.

-- On the morning of June 6, 2010, I remember vividly the sickening smell and feeling of loss and destruction as I walked through and around the rubble of our campus.

-- As I did so, I felt so completely overwhelmed by the magnitude of the destruction and the amount of time, effort, blood, sweat, and tears that it would take to get our H. S. timely rebuilt and our campus put back together again – all I could do was to cry out to God for his strength and help to accomplish such a huge task.

-- But, with His help, and the unbelievable work and sacrifice of our entire Administrative team and staff, we have made it through that natural disaster, and we will soon end up with one of the best campuses in Ohio at no cost to our taxpayers.

-- In many ways, however, this financial crisis that we now face presents us with a much different, and even a more formidable challenge than rebuilding after the tornado.

-- Perhaps that is because we knew where the available reconstruction funds were, and we went after them aggressively, and we successfully secured enough money from our insurance company and other sources to rebuild our H. S. and reconstruct and rebuild our entire campus.

-- But our current financial crisis is even more difficult and troublesome than  recovering from the destruction wrought on our campus on 6/5/10.

-- Although we cut $1.3 million out of our operating budget two years ago shortly  before the big storm, our revenues from the Federal, State, and Local governments have continued to plummet by another $1.6 million.

-- Nevertheless, our voters twice said “NO” to a 4.75 mill new operating levy in 2011, and we forever lost the $1.2 million dollars that would have been collected this year, 2012, if the levy had passed in 2011.

-- The fact is:  if we had passed the operating levy in 2011, these 43 jobs would not have been lost.

-- And the irony, if not the tragedy of this, is that if the levy had been passed in 2011, not only would these jobs have been saved, but many of us would not have  seen much, if any, of an increase in our taxes.

-- That’s because the County recently reevaluated our property values for tax purposes, and many of the residential property owners, like me, are now paying substantially less in property taxes than last year.  This is reflected by the fact that Lake Schools will receive $425,000 less in local property tax collections this year alone.

-- It is because that levy did not pass in 2011, along with a continued downward spiral of our revenues, that this Board now has no choice but to make these deep and devastating cuts.

-- Sadly, however, these cuts do not and will not solve our financial crisis.

-- These cuts merely allow us to stay afloat until February of 2013 when the additional revenue from the passage of an operating levy this year will start to be collected.

-- If this community does not pass an operating levy this year, we will only have two options left:

(1) impose a 3rd round of huge cuts effective January 1, 2013

    OR

(2) tell the State that we have done all that we can rationally do.

-- That second option simply means that the State will come in and tell us what levy amount has to be passed to educate our children.  The State does not and cannot provide any additional funding for financially insolvent school districts.

-- Finally, let me make several things clear.

-- First, these employees who are losing their jobs, most of whom live in our community, are all excellent and valued employees.  The ONLY reason they are being laid-off is because of financial crisis.

-- Second, each and every member of this Board and our Administration team worked tirelessly throughout last summer and fall to get the levy passed.  We spent countless hours and substantial personal finances in an effort to pass the operating levy last year in order to avoid the adverse events of tonight.  We all voted Yes.

-- Each and every one of us up here are essentially volunteers who care deeply, passionately, about our schools, our community, our employees, and most of all, our future – the students we educate.

-- It is heartbreaking to me that we are forced to take this action that we are now compelled to take.

-- May God have mercy on us.

I’m going to give a little history lesson.

  • Tim and I were appointed in late 2005
  • I was elected president in 2006 organizational meeting
  • Extra curriculars were cut
  • Bussing was cut
  • Staff was cut
  • Rob Miller, ODE, had just given a staffing analysis report that was strikingly identical to the one he gave last month.
  • We had 8 or 9 levy attempts in a row failed, even though we were in the bottom 15% in cost per student in the entire state.
  • We were rated continuous improvement.
  • There was plenty of criticism thrown out but little or no solutions offered.

 

I looked at several pages of old meeting notes and agendas and it jogged my memory:

  • Held several forums and discussions with political leaders and community members.  Council, mayors, twp trustees, community members invited
  • In those discussions
  • We came to consensus on direction and all agreed we needed additional funding. 
  • Meantime we hired Jeff and Jim.
  • Community passed a 6.75 mill levy
  • -BOE drew a line in the sand on cutting services and promised to:
  • Look at every aspect of what we do and combine efficiency and accountability by doing what’s best for kids and taxpayers.
  • -extra curriculars were looked at carefully and programs were cut or moth balled due to low participation or high cost
  • -a new level of accountability was instilled by Jim through his administrative staff

Every staff member, volunteer, coach, advisor…everybody from top to bottom was affected by his demand of striving for excellence. “is it good for kids and taxpayers?” became the litmus test for every decision.  Some not popular but all made the same way improving academics at the lowest cost possible became primary focus.

Later more emphasis in holding advisors and coaches accountable became the norm. All this created value.  All this costs money and we want to give community the biggest bang for their buck. One of the hot topics in our discussions was an agreement that inflation and rising costs would require the district to ask for new money.
Strong message was sent loud and clear 

More frequent, less millage.  3-5 mills every 5 years or so. Result?

  • Passed levy
  • Excellent or higher academic rating
  • Music, arts, athletic programs achieving at a high level.
  • Student leadership organizations are receiving national recognition,
  • Community spirit and student morale high.
  • We have so much to be proud of and here’s the kicker
  • We are still bottom 15% in cost per student.
  • Our unions stepped up and negotiated zero increase contracts and administrators frozen for 3 years in spite of reductions
  • Rob Miller’s own words described our district as “very lean”

 

What is the value in this commendation? WE ARE IN GRAVE DANGER OF LOSING ALL WE’VE GAINED.  We already have. How can we be in trouble? Tim said it well….but it’s worth repeating because people aren’t getting the message. Jeff saw the revenue crunch coming back in 09 and the downturn in the economy accelerated and compounded his predictions. The BOE reacted in 2010 by cutting another 1.3 million to offset our revenue decline from fed, state and local sources. Since then we’ve lost another $1.6 million in revenue and twice failed a 4.75 mill levy which is well within the prescribed “3-5 mills every 5 years or so”.

It is a very sad day today for all of us up here because we know in our hearts we did what we promised and more. Yet here were are about to cut services, close a building, and make the gut wrenching decision to cut the jobs of the very people who gave all they had to help get us where we are.

Make no mistake.  These cuts will affect education in a very negative way.
I pray the community opens it’s collective eyes and works with us to save our schools

We have known this day was coming since November when the levy was defeated, that certainly doesn’t make it any easier.  We are going to make a very difficult decision tonight that will affect many lives and we do not take that responsibility lightly.  We are going to lose many dedicated and hard-working employees.  We are going to negatively impact our students who are the reason we serve on this board.

There are so many good things happening in Lake Schools right now.  A few examples:
-Our new High School nearing completion.
-Being rated Excellent or better the last 2 years academically.
-A student winning the prestigious Jefferson Award.
-Our sports teams having success and in the running for the all-sports trophy for the second year in a row.
-11 students recognized as either excellent or superior for their musical and vocal talents.

There has been some criticism of our decision; much of it is centered on the Boards unwillingness to cut sports. Cutting sports would also include cutting all extra-curriculars including Band, clubs and many other worthwhile activities.  I promise you that everything was on the table when these cuts were decided on.  In 2004-2005 when the school was faced with a similar situation, sports and extra-curriculars were to be cut, we lost approximately 120 students to other schools.  At $5,800 which we receive for each student, that was a loss of almost $700,000 for one year.  This is far more than what is spent from the general fund for sports and extra-curriculars. 

If we are unable to pass a levy this year, the cuts we will be forced to make will be devastating and long-lasting and will exceed the cuts made here today.  The state has put us in this position and, unfortunately, only the community can do anything about it at this time.  I urge to remember today when you cast your vote in August.

Back at January's meeting we said that difficult decisions would have to be made and admitted that they will not all be easy and they will not all be popular.  Tonight, we have a decision to make that is neither.  Many quality people face the reality of not having a job when the school year starts in August.  These cuts are across the board and leave no area untouched.  They will impact teachers, coaches, custodians, bus drivers, the central office and students among others. 

For those people that believe that the teachers need to sacrifice, I point out that 8 jobs face elimination.      I also point out that for those left in the elementary, they will see approximately 20% additional responsibility as the average class size will increase from 20 students to 24 students.

For those that feel extra curricular need to cut, I point out that the cost of extra curricular activities is approximately 2.3% of the district's general budget, yet they do represent 5% of the total cuts.  The budget of the extracurricular is being cut by 18%. 

We are in an unfortunate situation that requires action.  There is a loss of funding from the federal government, the state government, and our own real estate tax collection has decreased.  And as a final punch to the gut, we will net a loss of over $213,000 in 2011 from students that open enrolled to other districts. 

The school is faced with a deficit, and not at its own doing.  Unlike the federal government or state governments, we can not simply pass this down the road for someone else to handle.  We must take responsibility and make these difficult decisions.

With that being said, and knowing that these cuts would only hold us over until we can collect new tax revenue an that is only IF a levy is passed this year, I will make the motion that we approve the resolution as stated on the agenda.

There is not too much that I can add to what Eric and Tim has already mentioned.  We knew that this time was coming after the failures of the last 2 levies. It is just unfortunate that some community members just can’t see all the good that is going on in our school system. We are having a new High School being built without any tax payers monies, we have been rated Excellent academically for the last 2 years, and the list goes on.

These cost reductions not only are hitting me hard for the fact that we as a school district are losing great employees but I have three children (5th, 3rd and Kind) and many friends that are all effected by these cuts as well and this again is not easy to swallow, but we as the BOA have to look out for what is best for the School District due to what the Federal Government, State and Real Estate Tax decrease we are left with.

We as a community need to put whatever differences we have aside and come together as a TEAM and take the responsibilities and make sure that our kids are getting the best education they can get from what I consider the best School District you could ask for.

Yesterday, we received an email saying that we were cruel and inhumane for laying off our employees. Nothing could be further from the truth. We opted not to make these very cuts LAST year in an effort to preserve jobs, and in hopes that SB5, which was eventually overturned in the November referendum, would yield significant cost savings.

Sadly, this did not occur. We suffered the state budget cuts, but did not receive the tools promised to us to help deal with the decrease in funding.

And in November, the results of the county tri-annual property tax update showed that the District had a 15% decline in residential property valuation that will result in a 370K loss in annual property tax revenue.

Additional, we lost another 55K due to county Board of Revisions appeals for several commercial properties.

All told, we will receive over 1.5 million LESS in funding this fiscal year than last year. Consequently, our cash balance is declining at an alarming rate.

We've also seen BLOGS accusing the District of mismanaging our money. If that were true, why in the last month has Tiffin, Otsego, Genoa, Benton Carroll Salem - all announced building closures and personnel layoffs. This is a very real issue facing school districts, and we are certainly not alone in trying to cope with thee challenges.

BOARD MEETING
MARCH 21, 2012


The cost cutting reductions contained in the resolution that the board of education is about to vote on were generated through many hours of discussion, simulation of different models, and research at both the local and state level.  All of this was accomplished in spite of knowing from the very beginning of the process that the end result was going to be detrimental to the students and the staff of this school district.  I want to thank the people involved in these meetings for their continued dedication to this organization even in the face of difficult decisions and the resulting difficult times.
Last Friday, many employees—good employees—were told that the end of the school year, or shortly thereafter, their contracts would be suspended and our schools would no longer employ them. 


As the board goes forward with a vote on this resolution, they do so with a heavy heart and a concern for our future much like those of us who had the task of making the decisions necessary to reduce expenditures to a level that would allow us to survive the dwindling revenues.

Loading

Lake Local Schools | 28090 Lemoyne Rd Millbury | OH 43447 | Phone: (419) 661-3000

Home |  SiteMap |  RSS Feed |  Login